In-depth review: Review Pull Requests on github or Merge Requests on gitlab with Ollama using LLMs
This tool offers a practical approach to automated code review by leveraging Ollama-hosted LLMs directly within GitHub and GitLab workflows. Rather than relying on proprietary cloud models, it puts the review logic in the hands of developers who already manage their own local or self-hosted language models. The integration is straightforward: after setting up Ollama and configuring API credentials, the browser extension can analyze pull requests or merge requests in real time, flagging potential issues, suggesting improvements, and providing inline feedback. What sets it apart is the degree of customization—users can define specific rules or guidelines that the LLM follows, enabling teams to enforce coding standards consistently. However, this flexibility comes with overhead: managing Ollama and selecting the right model for code review requires technical comfort and experimentation. The tool is best suited for solo developers or small teams who want to catch common issues before merging, especially those already invested in the Ollama ecosystem. It complements human reviewers by handling routine checks like formatting, anti-patterns, and documentation gaps, but it is not a replacement for nuanced judgment. The browser extension format limits its scope to manual triggers rather than automated CI integration, and there are no premium tiers or pricing details available, suggesting it remains a niche, community-driven utility. For teams seeking a zero-cost, customizable AI code review assistant that respects data privacy by running locally, this tool is a compelling option—provided they are willing to invest in the underlying LLM setup.
Who it's built for
Software developers
Why it fits
Solo developers can automate initial code checks before merging, catching common issues without needing a second pair of eyes.
Best value
Reduces manual review time and helps maintain code quality in projects with limited peer review bandwidth.
Caution
Requires Ollama setup and local LLM management, which may be a barrier for developers not already using Ollama.
Development teams
Why it fits
Small teams can enforce consistent coding standards and catch bugs early, even without dedicated code reviewers.
Best value
Provides automated, objective feedback on every PR/MR, speeding up the review cycle and reducing human bias.
Caution
The tool is a browser extension and may not integrate deeply with team workflows like CI/CD pipelines.
Code reviewers
Why it fits
Human reviewers can offload routine checks (e.g., formatting, common anti-patterns) to the LLM, focusing on higher-level design and logic.
Best value
Augments reviewer capacity by handling repetitive tasks, allowing reviewers to concentrate on nuanced issues.
Caution
The LLM may miss context-specific or complex bugs, and its suggestions should not replace thorough human review.
Key features
Automated code review using LLMs
Uses large language models via Ollama to analyze code changes in PRs/MRs and provide feedback on potential issues, improvements, and adherence to best practices.
Benefit
Catches common coding errors, style inconsistencies, and potential vulnerabilities that static analysis tools might miss, offering contextual suggestions.
Limitation
LLM accuracy depends on the model used and the quality of prompts; it may produce false positives or miss domain-specific issues.
Integration with GitHub and GitLab
Connects to GitHub and GitLab via their APIs to access pull requests and merge requests, posting review comments directly on the code changes.
Benefit
Seamlessly fits into existing development workflows without requiring manual file uploads or context switching.
Limitation
Setup requires API credentials and permissions; the browser extension may have limited functionality compared to a native CI integration.
Customizable review process
Allows users to define rules, guidelines, or prompts that tailor the LLM's focus to specific coding standards, issue types, or project conventions.
Benefit
Adapts the review to team preferences and project needs, making feedback more relevant and actionable.
Limitation
Customization depth is constrained by the LLM's instruction-following ability; complex or ambiguous rules may not be reliably enforced.
Ollama integration for LLM management
Leverages Ollama to run local LLMs, giving users control over which model to use and how it is configured, without relying on external APIs.
Benefit
Offers privacy and cost control since data stays local and no per-request fees are incurred, ideal for sensitive codebases.
Limitation
Requires Ollama installation and sufficient local hardware (e.g., GPU) to run LLMs efficiently, adding setup overhead.
Real-world use cases
Automating code review to save time
Solo developers and small teams with high PR throughputScenario
A developer with a high volume of pull requests spends significant time manually reviewing each one, leading to bottlenecks and delayed merges.
Solution
They configure the tool to automatically review every new PR, flagging potential issues and suggesting improvements before human review.
Outcome
Reduces manual review time by 30-50% for routine checks, allowing the developer to focus on critical changes and accelerate delivery.
Improving code quality by catching issues early
Development teams focused on code quality and standardsScenario
A team wants to enforce coding standards and catch common bugs (e.g., null pointer exceptions, insecure patterns) before code is merged into the main branch.
Solution
They customize the tool with rules that align with their coding guidelines, and it automatically comments on PRs with violations and suggestions.
Outcome
Reduces the number of bugs reaching production and ensures consistent code style across the team, improving maintainability.
Providing consistent, objective feedback
Teams with multiple reviewers seeking consistencyScenario
A team with multiple reviewers finds that feedback varies widely in tone and thoroughness, leading to inconsistent code quality and developer frustration.
Solution
They use the tool to generate initial, standardized feedback on every PR, which reviewers can then build upon with human insights.
Outcome
Establishes a baseline of objective, unbiased comments, reducing subjectivity and helping reviewers focus on higher-value feedback.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Automates the code review process
- Improves code quality and reduces errors
- Provides consistent and objective feedback
- Accelerates the development cycle
- Customizable review process
Cons
- Requires integration with GitHub or GitLab
- Accuracy depends on the quality of the LLM
- May require fine-tuning for specific coding styles or guidelines
- Potential for false positives or missed issues
Frequently asked questions
How does this tool integrate with GitHub and GitLab?Integration
It integrates via their REST APIs. You need to provide API tokens or OAuth credentials for the tool to access your repositories. Once configured, it automatically monitors new pull requests (GitHub) or merge requests (GitLab) and posts review comments directly on the code diff.
Can I customize the code review process?Workflow
Yes, you can customize the review by defining specific rules, guidelines, or prompts that the LLM follows. For example, you can tell it to focus on security vulnerabilities, enforce naming conventions, or ignore certain file types. However, the effectiveness depends on the LLM's ability to interpret your instructions accurately.
Is this tool free to use?Pricing
Yes, the tool itself is free. However, you need to run Ollama locally, which is also free and open-source. The only costs are the hardware resources (CPU/GPU, RAM) required to run the LLM models. There are no subscription fees or per-review charges.
Do I need to install Ollama separately?Workflow
Yes, you must install Ollama on your local machine or server to use this tool. Ollama manages the LLM models and provides an API that the browser extension communicates with. The tool does not include Ollama; it is a separate dependency.
What types of issues can the LLM detect?Limitations
The LLM can detect a wide range of issues based on its training, including syntax errors, potential bugs, security vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL injection, XSS), code style violations, and logic flaws. However, it may miss context-specific or domain-specific issues, and its suggestions should be validated by a human reviewer.
Related tools in AI Code Review

Apify is a full-stack platform for web scraping, data extraction, and automation.

Powerful, modular, open-source visual AI for generating video, images, 3D, audio.



AI-powered code editor for developers and enterprises, enhancing productivity and workflow.

